DEPRE'5sion
- rajaduttamd
- Jul 1, 2025
- 2 min read
🔍 DEPRE’5 Study Overview
A pragmatic, assessor-blinded, multi-centre randomized controlled trial compared five treatment strategies over 6 weeks in patients with Major Depressive Disorder who had not responded to an SSRI:
SSR‑I dose optimization (SSRI‑Opt)
Lithium augmentation of SSRI (SSRI + Li)
Nortriptyline combination (SSRI + NTP)
Switching to venlafaxine (VEN)
SSRI + Problem-Solving Therapy (SSRI + PST) clinicaltrials.gov+11researchgate.net+11cambridge.org+11
📊 Key Findings
Second-line approaches (excluding SSRI‑Opt) vs Dose Optimization:
Greater response rates: 28.2% vs 14.3% (OR = 2.36, 95% CI 1.0–5.6; p = 0.05)
Larger average HRDS‑17 improvement: –2.6 points (95% CI –4.9 to –0.4; p = 0.021) researchgate.net+1cambridge.org+1
Most consistent (though only marginally significant) benefits:
Venlafaxine switch:
OR for response ≈ 2.53 (95% CI 0.94–6.80; p = 0.067)
HDRS‑17 decrease ≈ –2.7 points (95% CI –5.5 to 0.0; p = 0.054) en.wikipedia.org+15researchgate.net+15pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov+15
SSRI + PST (psychotherapy):
OR ≈ 2.46 (95% CI 0.92–6.62; p = 0.074)
HDRS‑17 drop ≈ –3.1 points (95% CI –5.8 to –0.3; p = 0.032) sciencedirect.com+5researchgate.net+5pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov+5
Adverse effects:
Lowest in the SSRI + PST group (~28% mild)
Highest in SSRI + NTP (~75%), though mostly mild psychiatryai.com+14researchgate.net+14pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov+14
✅ Conclusions
Patients who don’t adequately respond to an SSRI typically benefit from a second-line strategy, rather than simply optimizing the SSRI dose.
Switching to venlafaxine or adding problem-solving psychotherapy showed the greatest consistent benefit, despite limited statistical power.
Based on safety and tolerability, SSRI + PST may be the most balanced option.
💡 Clinical Implication
If an SSRI fails initially, rather than increasing the dose, consider either:
Switching to an SNRI (like venlafaxine)
Or adding structured psychotherapy, such as problem-solving therapy
These strategies are supported both by clinical efficacy and tolerability data.




Comments